Blowing the Whistle on Canada’s Whistleblower Law

Last week I had the opportunity to appear as a witness at the Standing Committee on Government Operations for their review of the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act, commonly referred to as whistleblower legislation. I was joined by the Institute’s General Counsel Isabelle Roy.

I spoke to Members of Parliament on the Committee about the important contributions professionals working in the federal public service make every day to ensure the lives of Canadians are safer, healthier and more prosperous.

I reiterated that whistle blowing is a service to the public. It only happens in the rarest of circumstances, when a public servant has tried every other avenue for resolving a significant concern. Sadly, whistle blowing has also meant too often sacrificing your career for the sake of the public interest.

It should not be this way, and we can fix it. I made some specific recommendations to the committee which I have outlined below.

  • Reverse the onus of reprisal in law

Fear of reprisal remains one of the main obstacles to whistle blowing and the current law fails to address this concern. The simple solution is to require a reverse onus, which would mean that an allegation of reprisal is assumed to be true unless the employer can rebut it.

  • Fix the investigation process under the Public Service Integrity Commissioner.

Our experience in representing members demonstrates that the Commissioner's investigation processes are often unfair, lacking in thoroughness, and insensitive to whistleblowers.

  • Eliminate the Public Service Integrity Commissioner's gatekeeper role and replace it with a "direct access" system.

The commissioner performs a gatekeeper role in respect of reprisal complaints. This role means that only the Commissioner can decide which complaints are referred to the Tribunal.

  • Close the outsourcing loophole.

Federal over-reliance on outsourcing is creating a shadow public service, where the rules, regulations and guidelines for accountability do not apply. The shadow public service is a massive loophole when it comes to the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act.

We recommend that PC and MAC users download these files to their hard drive to avoid playback issues.

Our intervention on this issue resulted in my giving a few media interviews, including with CTV’s Power Play and CBC’s Out in the Open, featuring whistle blower Shiv Chopra.

You can take action on this issue by signing the following petition to protect whistleblowers here.

PIPSC will continue to advocate for legislative change to the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act and work to ensure the culture of punishing those who come forward is changed.

Better Together!

Debi Daviau

President


3 November 2017
We have received several inquiries about the impact of the Phoenix pay system on retroactive pay for members who signed new collective agreements this year.

27 October 2017
After years of advocacy, the Treasury Board has agreed to negotiate the addition of non-oral contraceptives to the Public Service Health Care Plan (PSHCP).

6 October 2017
Radio-Canada and the CBC have reported this week that Phoenix was “doomed from the start.” The reason? The business case prepared in 2009 under the previous government “lacked proper risk analysis and was politically motivated.” In the words of former parliamentary budget officer Kevin Page, “You look at this business case, you can drive trucks through some of the holes under the risk analysis.”

3 October 2017
In light of the Phoenix fiasco and as part of a commitment made to bargaining agents to make it easier for their members to obtain information about their pay, Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSCPC) has just released its Pay Bulletin for September.

2 October 2017
The Institute has just filed two new policy grievances on Phoenix-related issues, accusing the Treasury Board of failing to implement the terms of the AV and SP Group collective agreements within the specified timeframe (120 and 90 days respectively).

29 September 2017
While much has been reported about the impact of the Phoenix pay system on current federal employees, comparatively little has been said about the harm done to retirees.