Letter to Secretary of the Treasury Board Graham Flack about hazard pay and Code 699

Graham Flack
Secretary of the Treasury Board
90 Elgin Street
Ottawa Ontario K1A 0R5
By email: graham.flack@tbs-sct.gc.ca

February 1, 2022

Dear Mr. Flack,

I am writing regarding the inequitable treatment of thousands of front line federal health care workers represented by the Institute’s Health Services (SH) Group. These nurses, physicians, dentists, occupational therapists, physiotherapists, and psychologists, to name but a few of the professions involved, all perform work which cannot be done from home. This directly increases their chances of contracting Covid, yet the federal Employer refuses to recognize this basic fact and shows no willingness to provide them with “hazard pay” similar to those received by their provincial counterparts.

To compound the problem, our members unfortunate enough to contract the virus are required to use their sick leave for a 10 day isolation period even if they are asymptomatic. This is thoroughly unfair compared to the situation faced by our members working from home, who may be able to return to their duties much quicker or may even be able to continue working throughout their illness and isolation. To be clear, we are in no way suggesting that public service employees should work if they are ill. We are simply asking the Employer to allow the use of Code 699 Leave for our asymptomatic members prevented from attending their workplace.

Please be aware that this latter issue affects not only the front line health workers we represent, but also many of our professional members across the public service who find themselves in similar circumstances. This is not a trivial matter to our membership.

I wish to discuss this issue with you as soon as possible and I have asked my staff to communicate with your office in this regard shortly.

I thank you for your immediate attention to these critical points.

Sincerely,

Jennifer Carr
President,
The Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada

Published on 7 February 2022

3 November 2017

Phoenix and the status of retroactive pay

We have received several inquiries about the impact of the Phoenix pay system on retroactive pay for members who signed new collective agreements this year.

27 October 2017

Treasury Board agrees to negotiate better birth control coverage for public service employees

After years of advocacy, the Treasury Board has agreed to negotiate the addition of non-oral contraceptives to the Public Service Health Care Plan (PSHCP).

6 October 2017

Words to Live By

Radio-Canada and the CBC have reported this week that Phoenix was “doomed from the start.” The reason? The business case prepared in 2009 under the previous government “lacked proper risk analysis and was politically motivated.” In the words of former parliamentary budget officer Kevin Page, “You look at this business case, you can drive trucks through some of the holes under the risk analysis.”

3 October 2017

PSPC releases latest Pay Bulletin

In light of the Phoenix fiasco and as part of a commitment made to bargaining agents to make it easier for their members to obtain information about their pay, Public Services and Procurement Canada (PSCPC) has just released its Pay Bulletin for September.

2 October 2017

Institute files two new policy grievances over Phoenix

The Institute has just filed two new policy grievances on Phoenix-related issues, accusing the Treasury Board of failing to implement the terms of the AV and SP Group collective agreements within the specified timeframe (120 and 90 days respectively).

29 September 2017

The Phoenix Pay System’s Not-So-Golden Handshake

While much has been reported about the impact of the Phoenix pay system on current federal employees, comparatively little has been said about the harm done to retirees.